CPH Post

Editorial

Editorial: Danish confidentiality


The people are always right, aren't they? (Photo: Scanpix)

May 9, 2014
19:01

by Ejvind Sandal


The talk of the town is that the weekly gossip magazine Se og Hør used information leaked by an employee of the national payment system Dankort (now Nets) to learn the whereabouts of celebrities such as Prince Joachim and Princess Marie’s honeymoon resort. 

Others are also aggrieved, such as stand-up comedian Casper Christensen and his former wife, the actress Iben Hjejle, and those insulted that they weren’t being tracked. 

A number of journalists have been suspended and former editors are running out of excuses, and it is now taken as fact that such confidentiality breaches have been part of the daily routine at the magazine, and that bosses not only knew about it, but endorsed the practice and fired those who objected.

And now, quite some time after the source stopped working for Nets, the story has hit the public eye  with the ferocity of a page-turning novel, proving how real-life can often surpass even the best fiction. 

Heads will roll, the excuses will continue and politicians will bark about stronger measures, tighter control and what have you. Yes, the politicians, who never miss a chance to counterattack the press.

But the disclosure of confidential material is a crime. Whether current legislation is inadequate remains to be seen. 

Like the phone hacking scandal in the UK and the disclosures of Edward Snowden, the interesting thing will be to see what the public do.

Se og Hør has a print run of more than 100,000 copies per week. The folk tribunal can now decide what the politicians and the legal system cannot do – they can give their verdict in the most brutal way. 

Even if they don’t stop buying Se og Hør, it may still follow the way of British tabloid News of the World and fall on its sword.

If not, we will have to follow the correct legal procedures to punish the culprits and the professional stigmatisation of the lowlife journalists who did not live up to the ethical standards of the trade and their publisher. 

If people do not stop buying the magazine, then at least we will know that the readers of gossip are not restrained by the finer nuances of confidentiality protection, and that when it comes to gossip they could not care less.

The people are always right, aren’t they? 




Latest Comments

Copy any waterpark in California, only then you`ll have something worth...

(Jon Paris King on January 26, 2015 21:10)

You sound really bitter and self righteous.

(Juliousbass "the Future of Bass" on January 26, 2015 21:03)

Hey... At least he is working harder than real Danish doctors. ; )

(Alex DeGre?t on January 26, 2015 20:37)

Thumps up all the way to you sir!

(Line Dalsgaard on January 26, 2015 20:16)

Could there have been an explosion in Santa's secret underground bunker?

(Jens Rost on January 26, 2015 19:43)

Finally! The stench alone coming from these things are pestering the suburban...

(Jens Rost on January 26, 2015 18:31)

Some more statistics http://history1900s.about.com/library/holocaust/bldied.htm

(Chamberlain Walpole on January 26, 2015 14:02)

How much does this truck cost? How much does it cost to act like a civilized...

(Cliff Arroyo on January 26, 2015 13:17)

Ya know..... normally I would count this as good news, but given the...

(Cliff Arroyo on January 26, 2015 13:06)

HI Friends... I could go through following comments, thank you for the...

(Swapnil D Tembhurne on January 26, 2015 11:14)