European Parliament lambastes Denmark over border control

The decision by EU ministers to allow member countries to introduce border controls left European Parliament feeling it was being sidelined

June 13th, 2012 2:21 pm| by admin

Yesterday marked the lowest point of Denmark’s six month EU Presidency after MEPs launched vicious attacks on the justice minister, Morten Bødskov, over changes to Shengen border agreement that circumvented the European Parliament and the European Commission.

The row concerned last week’s decision by European justice ministers to bypass the two EU bodies to allow member states to introduce border controls with Shengen members that persistently fail to protect their borders with non-EU states.

With Denmark chairing the negotiations, it became the target of the MEP’s attacks and allegations that they had acted undemocratically and undermined the borderless principles behind the Shengen agreement.

"You have broken the relation of trust with this parliament, and broken away from the community method, which guarantees that larger member states cannot impose their will on smaller ones," Joseph Daul, leader of the centre right EPP group, told the parliament.

Daul called for parliament to refuse to work with the Danes for the remainder of its presidency, while others promised to legally challenge the move.

“For my part that, starting with the evening of June 7, the Danish presidency is no longer a credible interlocutor. From now to June 30 at midnight, we shall address ourselves exclusively either to the European Council or informally to the next presidency, of the Republic of Cyprus,” Dual said.

“We simply will not accept this. We must challenge the council's decision before the European Court of Justice,” said Guy Verhofstadt, leader of the liberal ALDE group. “We should halt all ongoing negotiations in the area of justice and home affairs under the Danish presidency.”

Some MEP’s also accused the Danish presidency of appealing to populism by allowing inter-Shengen border controls.

It did not help Bødskov that Denmark was the target of heavy criticism in the EU after it chose to introduce customs controls at the behest of the anti-immigration Dansk Folkeparti last summer – though the new government that was elected in September promptly removed them.

The changes to Shengen stem from concern voiced last year by about the threat to the EU from the large influx of migrants associated with the Arab Spring uprisings. Specific concerns were raised by France over the tens of thousands of Libyan migrants that had been given six-month residency in Italy and which could travel freely throughout the EU.

Last week EU justice ministers voted unanimously to allow the introduction of border controls between Shengen members but only after large scale illegal immigration had been identified through careful monitoring.

The border controls would be able to be introduced for six months at a time with extensions that could last up to two years.

"There must be no weak links in the chain when it comes to illegal migration," Bødskov told the media after last week’s vote. "Steps need to be taken quickly if Schengen cooperation is under threat."

What has upset MEPs is that ministers also voted to downgrade the influence of the European Parliament in decision making over Shengen. But while MEPs are claiming it was a move to deliberately sideline the parliament, Bødskov argued it was a purely legal move that had no political motivations.

Martin Schulz, the president of the European Parliament, acknowledged that Denmark was not solely to blame for the changes to Shengen that were supported by all 27 EU members. He did express dissatisfaction with the result however.

“We have a system with two political chambers,” Schulz said according to Berlingske. “With this decision one chamber is excluding the other. I hope that Denmark will reconsider the situation and return to the negotiating table.”

The EU home affairs commissioner, Cecilia Malmström, was also disappointed by the outcome.

“A year ago there was anger when a member state decided to close its borders unilaterally,” Malmström told Berlingske. “Now we are building a system where you can do it without it being a major problem. It concerns me deeply.”

First Siemens invested in the Humber, and now DONG (photo: iStock)
Trading Kingdoms: Continued investment bodes well for UK wind energy sector
Danish energy giant DONG will invest £6bn (60 billion kroner) in the UK of...
This cosy café is perfect for those that want their coffee first
Always first for chocolaty mixes at the cutting edge of coffee
As I entered this little cafe on Gammel Kongevej, there was only one rule: ...
Sometimes drones present danger to public security, for instance, when they get too close to airports (photo: iStock)
Falcon centre on Samsø to train birds of prey to destroy hostile drones
A falcon centre on the Danish island of Samsø is considering training bir...
Pegida was founded in the eastern German city of Dresden in 2014 as a protest against Muslim migrants in Germany (photo: Kalispera Dell)
Five men arrrested in anti-Islam demonstration
Five men were arrested at an anti-Islam demonstration that took place on Ax...
The donations will be divided among 12 Danish non-profit organisations, including CARE Denmark, Mellemfolkeligt Samvirke, Red Barnet, Danish Red Cross and UNICEF Denmark (photo: iStock)
Danes donate almost 100 million kroner to charity campaign
Danes have donated 97 million kroner to a national fundraising campaign org...
People are encouraged to report their observations and any possible findings of a meteorite to or (photo: H. Raab)
Meteorite hits Denmark
On Saturday night, hundreds of Danes witnessed a spectacular phenomenon as ...