Political leaders call Obama “assassin” for use of drones

Former immigration minister Søren Pind calls the US president “worse than Bush” for allowing remote attacks against enemies

July 25th, 2012 2:00 pm| by admin
facebooktwittergoogle_pluspinterestmail

Danish lawmakers are levelling unprecedented criticism at the US president, Barack Obama, for his use of remote-controlled attack drones in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen.

Rasmus Helveg Petersen, Radikale foreign policy spokesperson, told Politiken newspaper that Obama’s actions mirror those of the terrorists he professes to be fighting against.

“It’s terrible,” said Petersen. “The United States has no right to carry out these types of executions of suspected political adversaries. It contravenes international law.”

Petersen added that executing political adversaries within another country’s borders was tantamount to terrorism.

The comments came after Søren Pind, of the opposition party Venstre, in an interview with the magazine Ræson, likened the drone attacks to “assassination”.

“I criticised George Bush for allowing torture during his presidency,” Pind told Politiken. “But what he is doing is much worse and violates the principals of the Western world.”

Representatives from the far-left Enhedslisten joined in bashing the US president and said it would raise the issue with parliament’s foreign policy committee.  

The attack drone issue has arisen following the disclosure of Obama’s involvement in some 261 drone raids against suspected terrorists in Pakistan alone.

During his eight years in office, President George W. Bush approved a total of 45 drone attacks.  

Critics of drone operations say that the US is killing its opponents without due process while at the same time putting civilians at risk.

Some 1,000 civilians have been killed by drone attacks so far, according to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism in London,

The US Embassy was unavailable for a response to the criticism.

The foreign minister, Villy Søvndal (Socialistisk Folkeparti), was reluctant to wade into the fray.

“I am not prepared to comment further than saying that we do not use drones ourselves and that International rules must be adhered to,” said Søvndal

Ole Wæver, who teaches political science at the University of Copenhagen, said that drone attacks exists in a kind of legal vacuum, but added that the criticism should be viewed as marking a new chapter in Denmark’s relationship with the US.

“There has been until now broad political agreement that we stood shoulder to shoulder with the US, but people are slowly realising that the world order is changing,” Wæver told Politiken.

Wæver added that many in Demark feel that Obama has not lived up to their expectations.

“A lot of Danes have felt themselves allied with Obama, but that is not a permanent show of support. He has used up his goodwill account.”

Massive Attack2
Already massive, they’re edging towards institution status
They may be three decades old, but Massive Attack are still selling out ven...
Many asylum-seekers do not consider the all-important recognition rate (photo: iStock)
Denmark’s asylum rules might be reprimandable, but its recognition rate is robust
From the adverts in Lebanese newspapers in September 2015 warning them Denm...
If I’d known I’d stay on the Civil List, I would have done this years ago!
Straight, no Chaser: Of cabbages and kings
The blue touchpaper on the first New Year’s fireworks had barely been lit...
flag-993627_960_720
Today’s Date: Marie reaches 40
The flags will stay raised following Princess Mary’s birthday as not only...
The right mentor can make a huge difference (photo: iStock)
This Week in Schools: More graduates using mentors
A growing number of students at the University of Copenhagen (KU) are seeki...
Boat with syrian refugees off the coast of Sicily. (Photo: Vito Manzari from Martina Franca)
This Week’s Editorial: Tricky law followed by a piece of cake
Integration is the name of the game. The refugees are here – or on their ...