Danish politicians slam ‘shortsighted’ delay of EU Nature Restoration Law

Hungary’s last-minute move to block a seminal EU law on nature restoration has been met with outrage and disappointment from Danish politicians and environmental organisations.

Despite broad agreement amongst EU countries to introduce a major new law on nature restoration, the legislation has been put on hold.

At the last second, Hungary U-turned on its approval, making the ranks of the member states who will either vote against or abstain from voting on the law so large that the proposal is thereby postponed indefinitely.

Denmark’s Environment Minister Magnus Heunicke is worried: “I am concerned that the political agreement on the nature restoration regulation has not yet been finally adopted by the Council. It is a serious setback for the work for a better nature and biodiversity that the regulation is now being postponed. It is completely unheard of that we cannot rely on the agreements that have been negotiated,” he wrote in a statement to the media Altinget.

“The Nature Restoration Regulation is central to Europe’s work to curb the biodiversity crisis on our own continent. Denmark’s position is clear: We must have a long-term improvement of nature and biodiversity in the EU. We will work to make this happen,” says the minister.

“It’s a negotiation ploy”
Kira Marie Peter-Hansen, who is a member of the European Parliament for the Danish green left party SF, is also frustrated that several member states “are not standing by the agreement that was concluded with the European Parliament”.

“The Nature Restoration Act is an essential part of the EU’s Green Deal and absolutely crucial for us to achieve the green transition. But the law has become a symbol of the right-wing’s fight against the green transition. It is extremely unfortunate and short-sighted because no one wins in a climate crisis,” she says.

Venstre’s EU politician Morten Løkkegaard is also concerned, but calls for calm: “When you have ended up in a situation where you are dependent on Viktor Orbán, you know what that will mean,” he says.

“I think it’s a negotiation ploy, as usual. The law will probably be passed, but we just have to go through one more round,” he continues, and points out that nature restoration is a “fixed task” for the EU which needs to be addressed as we are “in the twelfth hour”.

“There is nothing perfect in this world, and neither is this Nature Restoration Act, but it is better than nothing,” Løkkegaard adds.

“One word: disaster”
The goal of the Nature Restoration Act is that member states undertake to gradually restore natural areas that have deteriorated. Over 80 percent of European natural areas are assessed to be in ‘poor condition’.

The environmental protection organisation Danmarks Naturfredningsforening calls it “decidedly incomprehensible” that no majority for the law could be achieved.

“The consequences in a Danish context can be described in one word: disaster,”  says senior advisor at Denmark’s Nature Conservation Association, Bo Håkansson. 

He describes contemporary efforts to preserve protected natural areas in Denmark as “very unambitious”, and criticizes EU politicians for being influenced by the agricultural demonstrations that have taken place in several European cities – including in Brussels.

“It is not a professional approach to change course in the final sprint. It is populist politics at its worst,” says Håkansson.

On 25 March, Brussels’ minister of the environment Alain Maron assured that the Belgian EU presidency will work hard to get the law voted through: “This is certainly not the end of this story,” he said at a press conference.

About the Nature Restoration Act
In the summer of 2022, the EU Commission put forward a proposal for a regulation on nature restoration. At the time, the Commission said that Europe’s nature is in “alarming decline”.

A year later, a qualified majority of EU member states agreed to vote in favour of the regulation. 

However, many countries requested changes to the original proposal and were therefore criticised for diluting the law.

In February 2024, the law was voted through the European Parliament with 329 in favour, 275 against, and 24 abstentions.

The regulation, if it is voted through, will mean that EU countries must work to restore the natural areas assessed to be in ‘poor condition’. 30 percent must be restored by 2030, 60 percent by 2040 and 90 percent by 2050.

All that remained was for the member states to again nod yes to the law. This requires, among other things, that the proposal be supported by member states that represent at least 65 percent of the EU’s population. With Hungary’s U-turn, the qualified majority is gone. 

Sweden, Poland, Finland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Austria and Italy do not intend to vote in favour either.




  • In conversation with Conrad Molden: The man behind the mic

    In conversation with Conrad Molden: The man behind the mic

    He’s tickled our funny bone with countless wisecracks and clever wordplay, and in the process, made Denmark feel a little more personable to many expats. An international import himself, funny man Conrad Molden has successfully carved out a niche for himself on the Danish stand-up scene, but it’s taken a solid 13 years, much trial and error, and heaps of Danglish

  • Volunteer Night 2025: when volunteering rimes with integrating

    Volunteer Night 2025: when volunteering rimes with integrating

    On Wednesday, April 30, from 17:00 to 20:00, Studenterhuset will host Volunteer Night 2025, a free event organized by the organization International House Copenhagen, which goal is to ease the relocation process for newcomers in Denmark

  • The international who shaped Copenhagen

    The international who shaped Copenhagen

    Anna Maria Indrio is one of the most important architects in Denmark, having contributed to shaping Copenhagen into what it is today. Among her best-known projects are the extension of SMK and Arken, as well as the Natural History Museum and the Darwin Centre in London. She moved here 60 years ago, when “Copenhagen was gray and dormant. Predictions suggested it would become depopulated. But putting people at the center changed everything,” she said

  • Danish government passes amendment to increase citizenship fee by 50%

    Danish government passes amendment to increase citizenship fee by 50%

    Fees were raised to reflect processing costs and curb repeat applications, creating debate over whether the new charges erect barriers to political participation for internationals.

  • Internationals’ labour contributes 361 billion DKK to Denmark’s GDP, and it is growing strongly every year

    Internationals’ labour contributes 361 billion DKK to Denmark’s GDP, and it is growing strongly every year

    According to a report by the Danish Chamber of Commerce, internationals’ contribution is 12% of the country’s GDP. In 2023, it was 322 billion DKK, and in 2008, it was 136 billion DKK. “Internationals make a gigantic difference in our prosperity and welfare,” comments Morten Langager, the Director of Dansk Erhverv.

  • Inside Denmark’s innovation engine

    Inside Denmark’s innovation engine

    With half of its staff being international, the BioInnovation Institute reflects Denmark’s broader transformation into a global innovation hub. But can the country—and Europe—keep up the pace? “If reforms are made now, we can close the gap in ten years,” explains BII’s CEO

Connect Club is your gateway to a vibrant programme of events and an international community in Denmark.