Report: Au pairs treated as cheap labour

Au pairs are often made to work far more than they are allowed but few complain out of fear of having to return home

Most au pairs come to Denmark to earn a living rather than to experience living in a different culture, according to a report from the Danish National Centre for Social Research (SFI).

Rather than being treated as guests who receive a nominal amount of pocket money in exchange for house work – the current minimum rate is 3,500 kroner a month for 30 hours of housework a week – the reality is that many are treated like cheap labour by busy families.

Dependent on their modest income, which many send home, the report finds that many au pairs tolerate poor working conditions out of fear of being kicked out of the country if they leave their host family.

“The scheme was devised at a time when young Europeans were travelling Europe and so it offered them security. But the guidelines were loosely defined because the idea was that the au pair would become part of the family,” Anika Liversage, a senior researcher at SFI, told Jyllands-Posten newspaper.

Europeans now only comprise a small number of the 2,409 au pairs who were last year given residency permits in Denmark. The majority, 81 percent, now come from the Philippines.

Liversage explains that the Filipinos often send their pocket money back home where it is used to pay for schooling or to cover living expenses.

“The scheme has therefore become a trade driven by [au pairs'] need to earn money abroad and the [Danish] family’s need for someone to do housework that no-one else wants to do,” Liversage said.

Of the 31 au pairs interviewed for the study, those who were well integrated into the family reported having the best experiences. However, the loose definition of the scheme means that it is not clear what exactly constitutes ‘working time’ and ‘household chores’ and some of the au pairs interviewed reported never having any free time.

“Au pairs rarely report families who break the scheme’s rules,” the report states. “And reports that are made rarely result in sanctions because the accusations are hard to prove.”

Unhappy au pairs are allowed to look for another family to stay with, but many don’t take the risk both because their families back home are dependent on the money they send and a fear that they won’t be able to find another family.

The Danish families do gain more than cheap labour through the scheme, however, as most of the 28 families interviewed reported that a degree of cultural exchange had taken place, though it was often described as an added benefit of the scheme.

SFI argues that the structure of the scheme could be blamed on the fact that it was drawn up with loose definitions about the roles of host families and au pairs.

They add that despite the good intentions of the programme, the two parties are unlikely to ever be equals, as one is living in the other’s home which automatically creates a dependent relationship.

Despite the problems that were reported, Liversage added that some of the au pairs interviewed said they had good relationships with their host families.

“Many said they felt really lucky to be given the opportunity to come to Denmark if viewed from an international perspective – they could have moved to Hong Kong and worked 12 hours every day for far less money," Liversage said. "Some think it’s really fantastic that they only have to work five hours a day in Denmark.”

The trade union FOA argues, however, that the report demonstrates that au pairs have essentially become cheap labour and that their working conditions and rights need to be improved to reflect this change.

“Cultural exchange is simply a by-product of the employment, which is why the rules need to be changed to match the rest of the labour market so that au pairs are given salaries and basic rights,” FOA spokesperson Jakob Bang told Politiken newspaper.




  • Today is 10 years from Copenhagen terrorist attack

    Today is 10 years from Copenhagen terrorist attack

    On February 14 and 15, the last terrorist attack took place in Denmark. Another episode occurred in 2022, but in that case, there was no political motive behind it

  • Enter Christiania: how the Freetown works

    Enter Christiania: how the Freetown works

    We all know Christiania and have been there at least once. But how does the Freetown work? How are decisions made? Can a person move there? Is there rent or bills to pay? British journalist Dave Wood wrote a reportage on Christiania for The Copenhagen Post.

  • The struggles of Asian women in Denmark’s labour market

    The struggles of Asian women in Denmark’s labour market

    Isha Thapa unfolds her research “An Analysis on the Inclusivity and Integration of South Asian Women in High-Skilled Jobs within the Danish Labor Market”. Thapa describes the systemic and social challenges these women face, ranging from barriers in social capital to cultural integration.

  • Parents in Denmark reject social media monitoring 

    Parents in Denmark reject social media monitoring 

    Most parents in Denmark reject using social media parental controls despite knowing about them. A new study questions the effectiveness of these tools in ensuring children’s online safety.

  • Analysis: we need a different education system for international children in Denmark

    Analysis: we need a different education system for international children in Denmark

    Data analyst Kelly Draper Rasmussen highlights that Denmark sees peaks in international migration during early childhood and high school years. However, with only one international education option, many families are forced to leave to secure different opportunities for their children.

  • Danish Refugee Council to lay off up to 2,000 staff

    Danish Refugee Council to lay off up to 2,000 staff

    After the anticipation from The Copenhagen Post, a press release by DRC has confirmed the plan to lay off thousands of employees in response to the recent halt of foreign aid spending by the Trump administration.